Yes No Share to Facebook
Limiting Laundry Access:
Disruptive Changes to Use of Laundry Facilities
Last Updated: August 23 2026
Question: When a landlord changes laundry access in my Ontario rental, what remedies can I claim at the Landlord and Tenant Board?
Answer: Woodcock Legal Services can help Ontario tenants respond if a landlord interferes with reasonable enjoyment by limiting shared laundry access beyond what the lease allows, including seeking compensation for extra laundry costs and rent abatement based on Landlord and Tenant Board decisions like JD v. LD's, 2017 CanLII 28729. The Landlord and Tenant Board can treat a fixed schedule change that substantially disrupts laundry access as improper interference, even if the landlord says it’s to reduce tenant tensions. For a quick next step, call (613) 334-6721 to discuss your lease terms, the actual laundry schedule you were given, and what timeline and evidence to bring for a strong application in Ontario.
Add this website to Google Preferred Sources
Decision Summary: JD v. LD'S, CET-63203-16 (Re)
The case of JD v. LD'S, 2017 CanLII 28729, provides an important decision from the Landlord and Tenant Board regarding the improper interference or disruption with the use of laundry facilities by the landlord. The legal dispute between the landlord and the tenant arose after the landlord attempted to alter laundry facilities access despite that the lease agreement expressly stated that the tenant, JG, could access the laundry facilities twice per week by contacting the upstairs tenants. The landlord, despite the twice per week term within the lease agreement, attempted to impose a condition that access to the laundry facilities be limted to a three-hour period, once per week, and only on Sunday.
Factual Details
In June 2016, new tenants moved upstairs. Subsequently, LD's restricted laundry access to Sundays between 11:00AM and 2:00PM. As JG worked in construction and needed to do laundry regularly, JG faced difficulties with the new schedule and needed to use a laundromat to supplement the unilaterally imposed once-a-week laundry access.
Decision Reasons
The Landlord Tenant Board found that the change in laundry arrangements significantly interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the property by the tenant. The shift to a fixed time on Sundays for laundry use represented a substantial interference compared to the previous arrangement without any time restrictions. While the Landlord Tenant Board acknowledged that the landlord was imposing the laundry access restrictions for the purpose of mediating tensions between tenants, the Landlord Tenant Board ruled in favour of JG.
Remedy Granted
The Landlord Tenant Board granted $200.00 for laundry costs as compensation to the tenant. Additionally, the Landlord Tenant Board awarded a rent abatement of ten percent per month for six months to the tenant.
Full Case
The official case judgment is available here: JD v. LD's, 2017 CanLII 28729
Conclusion
This decision in this case shows that even when a landlord is imposing a change in access to amenities for the purpose of relieving tensions between tenants, the imposition remains as an interference in the rights of the tenant.
NOTE: A considerable amount of online searches, such as “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in,” typically indicate a desire for prompt and competent legal assistance rather than a precise job title. In Ontario, licensed paralegals are regulated by the same Law Society that governs lawyers and are permitted to represent clients in specified litigation issues. Skills in advocacy, legal analysis, and procedure are vital to this role. Woodcock Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed framework, focusing on strategic positioning, evidentiary preparation, and effective advocacy aimed at securing timely and beneficial outcomes for clients.

