Yes No Share to Facebook
Limiting Laundry Access:
Disruptive Changes to Use of Laundry Facilities
Last Updated: July 01 2026
Question: Can Woodcock Legal Services help me if my landlord changed my laundry access in Ontario without my consent, and what outcome could I expect?
Answer: If you’re in Ontario and a landlord (including a Paralegal) has reduced or time-restricted your laundry access in a way that disrupts your reasonable enjoyment of the rental, Woodcock Legal Services of Professional Legal Services can help you assess the facts, review your lease terms, and prepare an application to the Landlord and Tenant Board for a remedy such as compensation for laundry costs and a rent abatement where interference is found; in JD v. LD’s, 2017 CanLII 28729, the Board awarded $200 for laundry costs and a 10% rent abatement for six months despite the landlord’s claim that the change was meant to reduce tenant tensions. Call (613) 334-6721 to discuss your situation and next steps.
Decision Summary: JD v. LD'S, CET-63203-16 (Re)
The case of JD v. LD'S, 2017 CanLII 28729, provides an important decision from the Landlord and Tenant Board regarding the improper interference or disruption with the use of laundry facilities by the landlord. The legal dispute between the landlord and the tenant arose after the landlord attempted to alter laundry facilities access despite that the lease agreement expressly stated that the tenant, JG, could access the laundry facilities twice per week by contacting the upstairs tenants. The landlord, despite the twice per week term within the lease agreement, attempted to impose a condition that access to the laundry facilities be limted to a three-hour period, once per week, and only on Sunday.
Factual Details
In June 2016, new tenants moved upstairs. Subsequently, LD's restricted laundry access to Sundays between 11:00AM and 2:00PM. As JG worked in construction and needed to do laundry regularly, JG faced difficulties with the new schedule and needed to use a laundromat to supplement the unilaterally imposed once-a-week laundry access.
Decision Reasons
The Landlord Tenant Board found that the change in laundry arrangements significantly interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the property by the tenant. The shift to a fixed time on Sundays for laundry use represented a substantial interference compared to the previous arrangement without any time restrictions. While the Landlord Tenant Board acknowledged that the landlord was imposing the laundry access restrictions for the purpose of mediating tensions between tenants, the Landlord Tenant Board ruled in favour of JG.
Remedy Granted
The Landlord Tenant Board granted $200.00 for laundry costs as compensation to the tenant. Additionally, the Landlord Tenant Board awarded a rent abatement of ten percent per month for six months to the tenant.
Full Case
The official case judgment is available here: JD v. LD's, 2017 CanLII 28729
Conclusion
This decision in this case shows that even when a landlord is imposing a change in access to amenities for the purpose of relieving tensions between tenants, the imposition remains as an interference in the rights of the tenant.
NOTE: A considerable amount of online searches, such as “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in,” typically indicate a desire for prompt and competent legal assistance rather than a precise job title. In Ontario, licensed paralegals are regulated by the same Law Society that governs lawyers and are permitted to represent clients in specified litigation issues. Skills in advocacy, legal analysis, and procedure are vital to this role. Woodcock Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed framework, focusing on strategic positioning, evidentiary preparation, and effective advocacy aimed at securing timely and beneficial outcomes for clients.

